Google believed it could make the mobile planet a much better spot with the Android software. The recipe for revolution was easy: Provide a very capable software platform in a quite open improvement model, and then watch as handset designers and service providers jostle to squeeze each and every ounce of prospective goodness out of this inviting answer.Sounds fantastic in theory, only it hasn't specifically worked out that way.
Back to reality As an alternative, profit motives on a number of levels of the mobile food chain have created a messy political image. Buyers must be enjoying the fruits of a speedy release schedule but are often stuck in a purgatory of old software -- designed by the really openness that was meant to maintain them all up to date.
You know how millions of customers, both consumers and corporations, are still using Windows XP despite the very best efforts from Microsoft to sell them Vista and then Windows 7 to replace that old, crusty operating program? Google is experiencing the exact same issue, only on a a lot faster schedule.
Microsoft produced a commodity out of the Computer, so you'd get roughly the same Windows XP experience running on a Dell laptop or a Lenovo desktop. But then Windows was just Windows -- why would you go by means of the hassle of upgrading when the old 1 worked properly adequate?
And now Google is stuck in a comparable no-upgrade loop for equivalent factors. The big losers are Android purchasers.
Ruling with an iron fist -- or not
Apple keeps the vast majority of its mobile customers on version 4 of its iOS computer software. The business performs with a restricted (albeit developing) quantity of networks and controls both hardware and software in-residence. This offers Apple tremendous energy to update your handset's software as it deems correct. Bug-fix releases and main new characteristics get pushed out like clockwork.
By contrast, Google can only publish bleeding-edge software and then hope that the rest of the ecosystem works it all out. For example, Samsung reportedly has a 2.2 version of Android prepared to go for the Galaxy S version it ships out to Deutsche Telekom subsidiary T-Mobile, dubbed the Samsung Vibrant. But the handset is stuck with version two.1 and its much-inferior efficiency due to the fact Samsung supposedly feels that an upgrade would dilute the value of the upcoming Vibrant 4G+ model, which may run either 2.2 or two.three and will use that fact as a selling point more than the older and probably less costly Vibrant.
Google has given the handset makers and service providers adequate rope to produce a large, tangled mess. For the most component, even main version updates never matter significantly and customers should be in a position to get along just fine with older software. But it is borderline irresponsible to deny upgrades for motives of politics or planned obsolescence when a straightforward computer software push breathes new life into an otherwise obsolete model. That's the case with Android two.two, and Google can not do a darn issue to make its partners run these updates.
image by way of gottabemobile
read full @ msnbc.comimage
Title: How Android Imitates Windows
Rating: 910109 Votes
Rating: 910109 Votes
Posted by: Admin Updated at: 4:46 AM